Every year, federal agencies assess over a hundred thousand proposals that they never fund. Treating those peer review as public infrastructure could help unlock much more philanthropic capital for American research.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) together run the most prolific scientific evaluation operations on the planet. Every year, they collectively review 110,000+ proposals, spanning everything from fundamental biology to quantum computing. While there is not wide agreement regarding how reviews should be conducted or how funding decisions should be made, no other process exists that applies rigorous, standardized review on such a comprehensive set of proposals.
City Journal
August 7, 2026
Financial Times
July 13, 2026
June 4, 2026
RealClearPolitics
June 3, 2026
408 C Street NE
Washington, DC 20002-5818
America Already Built the World's Largest Science-Vetting Machine – The Foundation for American Innovation
By: SUDO
August 12, 2026
Recent Posts
- Democratic Michigan Senate hopeful Abdul El-Sayed explains how science influences his politics – Scientific American
- Here’s the newest faculty members of LSU’s College of Science – lsureveille.com
- Scientists, Regulators and Industry Convene at PCPC’s 2026 Science Symposium – Happi | Household And Personal Products Industry
- The AI Shift: Is AI supercharging science? – Financial Times
- Evolution and climate change are missing from Florida's proposed science standards – WFSU News
Recent Comments
No comments to show.
Subscribe to our newsletter!