Southern Fried Science
Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online
If you spend any time scrolling through the Federal Register (and let’s be honest, that’s just one of the cool, hip, and happening ways we pass the time here at Southern Fried Science), you will notice an alarming trend. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) is widely considered the gold standard of conservation law and it has a near-perfect track record of preventing extinction… until now. At present the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) are asleep at the wheel. The agencies aren’t just falling behind; they are actively failing to uphold their statutory duties, leaving hundreds of vulnerable species stranded in administrative purgatory. This isn’t the fault of the majority of those in the agencies; commands are coming from leadership to delay and stall vital work related to the ESA.
The ESA outlines a clear, legally mandated timeline for protecting species. When a petition is filed to list a species as threatened or endangered, the agencies have 90 days to make an initial finding. If there is substantial information, they have 12 months to conduct a status review and decide if listing is warranted. This was by design—it was written this way to promote the rapid designation of protections for species in “jeopardy.”
But now, instead of months, species will be waiting decades.
There is currently a crushing backlog of species that have been deemed “warranted but precluded.” This is bureaucratic code for: “Yes, this animal is sliding toward extinction, but we don’t have the time, money, or political will to deal with it right now.” For many species, this administrative limbo is a death sentence. They remain unprotected while the very threats pushing them to the brink, such as habitat destruction, climate change, and overexploitation, continue unabated.
Ghost listings
When listing decisions take 10 to 20 years, we get what conservationists call “ghost listings.” NMFS and FWS routinely finalize listings or declare critical habitat for species that may already be functionally extinct in the wild. We are essentially conducting autopsies instead of providing emergency medicine.
Agencies frequently cite a lack of funding from Congress to manage their workload. While underfunding is a real and chronic issue, both agencies have also shown a historical aversion to political conflict. Listing a high-profile marine fish or a terrestrial apex predator often draws fire from powerful industrial, agricultural, and commercial fishing lobbies. Rather than bracing for the legal and political fights required to defend biodiversity, agency leadership often drags their feet, delaying decisions until forced to act by environmental lawsuits. They seem far more willing to be sued by always-financially-strapped NGOs than by deep-pocket industry.
The limbo list
When you pull back the curtain on species managed by NMFS, you find a literal warehouse of high-profile marine animals sitting on the “Proposed” or “Awaiting” shelf. These are species where the science already shows that they are in danger, yet they remain trapped in bureaucratic stasis.
Here’s a quick example of marine species currently languishing in the NMFS backlog:
1. Proposed but stalled
These are species where NMFS has actually completed a status review, they have formally agreed that the species is at risk, and have published an official proposal to list them under the ESA. Legally, NMFS is supposed to finalize a listing within one year of proposing it. However, these proposals are currently just sitting on the shelf:
2. Petitions on ice  (awaiting 90-day or 12-month findings)
Before a species can even be proposed for a listing, NMFS has to answer public petitions. The law says they have 90 days to issue an initial finding and 12 months to conduct a thorough status review. NMFS routinely misses these deadlines, keeping highly vulnerable species out of the listing system entirely.
3. Fishy purgatory
Because protecting Pacific salmon and steelhead directly collides with massive infrastructure, logging, and agricultural water rights, NMFS historically drags its feet on listing of salmon species, until forced by a judge. Currently Gulf of Alaska Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) have the worst returns in recorded history and environmental groups have had to threaten aggressive legal action just to force NMFS to issue its basic status findings on these imperiled fish.
By keeping these animals under “review” or at “proposed” status indefinitely, NMFS leadership successfully avoids the legal obligation to designate critical habitat or enforce strict federal protections and consultation requirements that could otherwise halt destructive commercial projects.
Litigation, you are our only hope
This brings us to the most damning indictment of the current state of ESA implementation. In order for anything to happen, NGOs have to sue the government.  
Organizations like the Center for Biological Diversity, NRDC, Animal Welfare Institute and Earthjustice spend millions of dollars every year dragging FWS and NMFS to court just to force them to meet their basic, legally mandated deadlines and statutory requirements. We’ve reached a point where the default operational strategy for federal wildlife agencies is “wait for a court order.”
Agency leadership then complains that they are spending too much of their valuable time in court. Opponents of conservation in Congress and industry also falsely try to make out that when NGOs win their court cases, they are getting huge cash settlements and that they are suing as a fund-raising tactic. However,  agencies are being sued because their leadership is preventing agency staff from conducting even the most fundamental parts of their jobs and legal obligations. The only money NGOs might see is court costs.
This sue-and-settle cycle is an incredibly inefficient way to run a conservation strategy. It forces agencies to prioritize species based on which stakeholders have the best lawyers and deepest pockets (usually industry), rather than which ecosystems and species are facing imminent collapse.
Escaping purgatory
The Endangered Species Act is a masterpiece of environmental legislation, but if FWS and NMFS leadership continue to treat statutory deadlines and legal obligations as optional suggestions, the ESA will become a paper tiger.
We need to hold both the executive and legislative branches accountable. This means demanding Congress fully fund and staff the listing programs so agency leadership cannot use the “empty pockets” and “understaffed” excuse. But more importantly, it requires leadership within FWS and NMFS to be brave enough to stand up to the politicians and their cabinet secretaries and to enforce the law as written. Extinction doesn’t act on a timeline dictated by bureaucratic inertia and politics.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *








This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It’s like Google Reader, except it still exists.
Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.
Theme: Oceanly Premium by