The Royal Society is a self-governing Fellowship made up of many of the world’s most eminent scientists, engineers, and technologists.
Discover events, scientific meetings and exhibitions held by the Royal Society, as well as access to videos of past events and information on our venue.
Discover new research from across the sciences in our international, high impact journals. Find out more about our values as a not-for-profit society publisher, our support for open science and our commitment to research integrity.
Find out about our work in areas of current topical interest to the Royal Society.
The Royal Society provides a range of grant schemes to support the UK scientific community and foster collaboration between UK based and overseas scientists.
The Society’s medals, awards and prize lectures recognise excellence in science and technology. Our most prestigious award, the Copley Medal, was first awarded in 1731.
Explore the latest work from the Royal Society, from news stories and blog posts to policy statements and projects. You can also find resources for teachers and history of science researchers.

Science is the bedrock on which modern societies have been built and is essential in navigating the complexities of life on Earth. Although many of science’s greatest discoveries have depended on reductionism, contemporary demands on science are increasingly for understanding of higher-level systems. One of science’s insights has been that all phenomena are interconnected, implying the absence of barriers between the natural, social, medical and engineering sciences and parts of the humanities. Science is a way of working, not a set of subjects. Irrespective of the route by which a truth claim is developed, the claim and all relevant evidence must be made widely available to be tested against logic and reality through the scrutiny of peers. The word “science’ as used here applies to all the disciplines of scholarship.
The shift from analogue to digital information systems has created new scientific possibilities, including enabling AI, but also rewired the communication networks that are essential to the functioning of human society. The centralised, edited, one-way analogue systems of radio-television-newspapers-books have been replaced by decentralised, unedited, two-way, interactive systems. The expectation was that the digital network, would create a ‘global village square’ of democratic integration and cooperation. The reality has been tribalism.
Rather than a space that recognises and celebrates diversity, the internet is a space of intolerance, fuelled by algorithms that reinforce outrage and discourage restraint to create self-insulating bubbles of certainty, fuelled by conspiracy theories and misinformation. But where does the truth lie? Those that benefit from confusion advocate “alternative facts” or “flooding the zone with shit”. The very institutions that have provided the frame for social solidarity in modern democracies are crumbling before our eyes. Capturing public attention has become paramount. It overrides debate and sweeps evidence aside. If you can’t be heard, it doesn’t matter what you say.
Major discoveries in the natural sciences
How has science fared in this environment? As the digital revolution gathered pace, the opportunities for general public availability of scientific publications were recognised but blocked by a failure of publishers and scientists’ institutions to adapt to change. Scientists have been incentivised to write papers for other scientists to read, whilst publishers’ high paywalls have put these beyond the reach of a wider public. Large language models have supercharged an industry of fake papers and fake data that have polluted the record of science. Science communication still works in analogue mode, whilst society has become digital. The voice of science is drowned in a digital cacophony. Its voice is both unheard and unheeded.
If the future is to be determined by the application of science, science itself must become more democratic. It must avoid privatisation of knowledge where society is presented with technological changes that appear to outpace the slow tempo of democratic processes thereby encouraging the emergence of technocratic dictatorships. So where is the human scientific resource that could lead democratisation? It is estimated that 73% of research in OECD countries is done in private companies with much of the remainder done in universities. Commercial scientists ultimately owe duty to the company they serve, where financial interests and scientific perspectives are not always aligned, whilst university scientists owe their duty to the public. Universities have the potential to understand the trajectory of new knowledge creation and its implications, and to maintain social awareness of this through public engagement. It is in this domain where action and the voice of science are most urgently to be felt and heard. Mobilising the universities to play this key role in digital society should be an important national priority. But how?
Universities should be a continuing source of knowledge for graduates and for wider society in their region, stimulating and supporting citizen science and the transdisciplinary mode, with scientists working across the disciplines with societal stakeholders to address major problems. Universities’ potential to contribute is inhibited by the incentivization of research to the detriment of other priorities. The growing mountain of worthless publication is evidence that much academic effort could be re-directed towards public engagement without negative impact on national research creativity. It is time that this broader perspective of the social contribution of universities is taken up by governments, with funding mechanisms that liberate universities to engage more deeply with their ambient societies. It is vital at this moment in human history that the full potential of science as set out by Berthold Brecht is realised, “not to open the door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error.”
Read the full article to find out more. Royal Society Open Science is an open access journal that welcomes the submission of all high-quality science. More information about the submission process can be found on our webpage.
Image captions
Figure 1: Universities through time: Al Azhar, Cairo. Bologna, Italy. Bangkok, Thailand.
Figure 2: Depiction of major discoveries in the natural sciences: climate change, the mechanism of inheritance, and the structure of matter.
This blog post was originally posted by Comment Central.

Callum Shoosmith
In Publishing
4 min read
Royal Society Open Science is pleased to welcome each of its new editors this year.
Bernhard Sabel
In Publishing
5 min read
Bernhard A. Sabel at the Otto-von-Guericke-University of Magdeburg, Germany and Dan Larhammar at…
Dr Fedir Korobeynikov
In Publishing
3 min read
A new Science, Society and Policy article in Royal Society Open Science proposes an adaptive…
We promote excellence in science so that, together, we can benefit humanity and tackle the biggest challenges of our time.
Subscribe to our newsletters to be updated with the latest news on innovation, events, articles and reports.
What subscription are you interested in receiving? (Choose at least one subject)
The Royal Society is a Fellowship of many of the world's most eminent scientists and is the oldest scientific academy in continuous existence.
Useful links
Legal
Visit us
© 2026 The Royal Society. All rights reserved. Registered charity number 207043