REPORTED BY HUMANS SINCE 2009
Builders is a newsletter, live interview series and annual event. The 2026 Technical.ly Builders Conference was a great success. Search our newsroom’s session recaps and view photos from the May 6-8 event in Philadelphia.
• Northeast Ohio won a new NSF Regional Innovation Engine. Led by Case Western Reserve University, NEO-SMART can access up to $160M in federal funding over 10 years.
• Whether university research spins out into a new startup or gets licensed to an incumbent depends on which institution is organized to carry it across the “valley of death.” Startups are not inherently better.
• The engine’s headline goals (20,000 jobs retained/trained, corporate R&D up 50%) are mostly a bet on existing firms; the 250 planned seed investments are the entrepreneurial sliver. What finally matters is livelihoods, not number of companies.
Picture a breakthrough in a Cleveland research lab — say, a new polymer coating that could make factory equipment last twice as long. The scientist files an invention disclosure to university administrators. Then comes a decision most people never see.
It forks two ways. The university can license the patent to an established company: a Sherwin-Williams or an Avery Dennison, both headquartered in the region, both already selling coatings at global scale. Or it can spin the discovery into a brand new startup that exists for no reason other than to develop this one idea.
The choice is rarely ideological, and the honest question underneath it is stranger: Does it actually matter which way it goes?
Is an NSF Engine’s $160 million in advanced science investment meant to grow new companies, or make old ones stronger?
Northeast Ohio was named this week the site of a new National Science Foundation Regional Innovation Engine. Dubbed NEO-SMART, it’s being led by Case Western Reserve University, and will be able to access up to $160 million in federal funding over 10 years. It has more than $120 million already committed by over 70 regional partners. It’s one of a dozen newly named NSF Engines, joining an existing cohort.
The Ohio coalition’s stated goals are telling: create or retain 20,000 jobs and lift corporate R&D by half, and also support 1,000 ventures and back 250-plus startups with seed money.
So which is it — is the $160 million in advanced science investment meant to grow new companies, or make old ones stronger? As Technical.ly has followed the federal dollars spread across dozens of “Tech Hubs” and “NSF Engines,” the question has felt increasingly pressing.
Yet for local residents and American taxpayers, does the answer change anything?
I put versions of that to Baiju Shah, president and CEO of the Greater Cleveland Partnership, when we spoke on Builders Live. Shah, a former biotech founder who now runs what he calls the country’s largest metro chamber, sits on the newly funded NEO-SMART coalition governing board.
Our conversation was scheduled to be about his “All-In” regional strategy — the unglamorous, years-long coalition work that made the award possible. Then the award landed the same week.
When federally funded research becomes a product, a startup is one option, not the destination.
Since the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 let universities patent and license inventions made with federal money, the machinery has been the same: a scientist discloses, and a tech-transfer office decides who can realistically carry the idea into the world. Sometimes that’s an incumbent. The first FDA-approved CAR-T cancer therapy came out of the University of Pennsylvania — but through an alliance with Novartis, which already had the manufacturing and trial muscle to turn it into a regulated product. No spinout required (though others did follow).
Sometimes it’s a startup, because nobody else is organized to try. When researchers delivered CRISPR gene editing by the 2010s, no company had a division for it, so competitive ventures like Editas and Intellia formed to answer a single question: Can this become something? When mRNA looked impractical, big pharma passed, and Moderna and BioNTech grew up around the platform instead. They became household names during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Meaningful university intellectual property goes one of those three ways: Licensed to an existing firm, embedded in a new startup (especially if the inventor wants to lead), or held for the future.
The pattern isn’t startup versus corporation. It’s general-purpose institutions versus mission-specific ones. A university is built to discover. A large firm operates at large scale.
Startups efficiently organize capital to bet everything on one uncertain idea — driving outsized gains for those around them. The new company appears when no existing institution is configured to carry that particular science across what investors call the “valley of death.”
Shah is refreshingly candid that his field has moved past its old fantasies. In the early 2000s, he told me, economic developers chased corporate relocations or tried to become the next Silicon Valley — both “low probability” plays. What they missed was the organic growth of firms already there.
Newsletter
Get the weekly briefing on your local tech ecosystem
Original journalism on the founders, funders and policies moving innovation forward. Choose your region, get a national overview with Innovation Wire or join decision-makers on Builders.
His engine reflects that. A few years ago, GCP mapped where research actually happens in the region and found more than two-thirds of it sits inside corporations, not universities. NEO-SMART is largely a machine for connecting those incumbents — metals, polymers, chemicals, coatings — and speeding up what they already do. The 20,000 jobs are mostly retained and trained, not founded. (Skeptics may rightly point out that what counts as a “retained” job is debatable.)
Shah still describes this as the kind of “ecosystem approach” that is shaping economic development nationwide. The metaphor’s point is that a place needs species of different size, shape and risk profile. For readers who follow my argument that new businesses, not big or small ones, drive net job creation, it’s worth saying plainly: a $160 million science bet can center entrepreneurial ecosystem building, while incorporating research institutions and corporate scale. The 250 seed investments are the entrepreneurial sliver.
Like federally-funded economic development strategies nationwide, we’ll see which ones are serious about developing new starts while harvesting incumbents.
Which returns me to whether the “startup or license” question matters at all.
As Georgia economic developer Jonathan Chambers recently reminded me: “Entrepreneurship is an incredible servant but a poor master.” Science, startups, economic development — these are the means. Montana’s Headwaters Tech Hub chief Tim VanReken tells me this too: The ends are quality of life, health, happiness and meaning for more of us.
A cancer therapy that reaches patients did its job whether Novartis or a spinout delivered it. A coating that keeps a factory (and its payroll) in Ohio serves the community regardless of which entity holds the patent. New firms have more economic benefits, but only if they have a chance to succeed.
Shah, for all his growth-and-prosperity language, landed in the same place when I asked what I should check on in two years. Not startup counts. Whether the region’s population is still turning around, whether its working-age numbers keep climbing, whether people want to live there. Investment in neighborhoods, parks and culture, Shah said, “isn’t just about having shiny objects.” The science is a shiny object too, if it gets mistaken for the point.
Back to that coating in the Cleveland lab. The sharp question isn’t whether it becomes a startup or a license. It’s whether $160 million in public and regional money organizes the long passage from public knowledge to shared livelihood — and who captures the upside when it does.
Local organizers prize the benefits for Northeast Ohio. But this is federal money. Count the startups if you like. I’ll be watching who ends up better off.
Before you go…
Subscribe to Technical.ly’s newsletters to stay connected with your community. Each week, we share the latest in tech news, startup trends, career success stories, key resources and job opportunities, all delivered straight to your inbox.
After a decade in Wilmington, the expansion brings flexible office space and community resources to a major redevelopment project in the Nylon Capital.
Plus, Wistar Institute and Apprenti’s new partnership, the 2026 Nucleus Awards winners and more power moves.
The region follows a national trend of fewer deals, with AI companies dominating the ones that do happen.
After federal budget cuts hit his latest brain-tech startup, Dick Moberg secured a $600,000 seed round to bring his product to market.
Glenn Youngkin, who served from 2021 to 2025, is returning to the private sector as chair of McLean-based Red Cell Partners.
The Delaware entrepreneur is building Much Different World to help people protect their voice and likeness from unauthorized use.
Precious Jones launched FairRide AI, a web platform to grade repair estimates and help drivers spot overpricing.
Mark Bastille Day with a little professional regime change.
Founded by a Penn graduate and Marine veteran, the Philadelphia startup plans to add six local roles and scale its bidding platform.
Raaha analyzes factors like schedule predictability, communication style and remote work to help identify supportive job opportunities.
Over the past few months, Technical.ly has covered a lot: individual success stories, workforce development programs and construction in sectors both old and new.
The Pava Center’s inaugural program offers $5,000 grants and tailored mentorship to older graduates who missed the university’s entrepreneurship support boom.
Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.
All News
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Maryland
DC
Delaware
Omaha
National
Civic Tech, Policy & Government
Entrepreneurship & Business
Workforce & Jobs of the Future
Careers Resource Hub
Preferred Partners
Advertise With Us
Our Team
Our Services
Strategic Vision
Awards & Accreditations
Ethics in Journalism
Privacy Policy
Report an Issue
Contact Us
Make Technical.ly a preferred source when searching for tech and startup ecosystem news!
Sign in by entering the code we sent to , or clicking the magic link in the email.
Read our Privacy Policy here. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.