Home → Features → History and Humanities → History
The fashionable poulaines were meant to send a simple message: "I have money, I follow the court, I do not labor with my hands"
In 1463, England’s Parliament turned its attention to an urgent matter: men’s toes.
A new law restricted people below the rank of lord from wearing shoes or boots whose pointed tips extended more than two inches beyond the foot. The legislation also targeted short jackets that exposed the buttocks and genitals, treating the two fashions as parts of the same indecent spectacle.
The shoes, known as poulaines, pikes or crakows, could look preposterous to us now. Some tapered into carrot-shaped points that had to be packed with moss, hair or wool so they would not collapse. In many cases, wearing these shoes for extended periods caused painful foot deformities. Yet medieval Europeans still wore them because the shoes performed several social functions at once: they displayed wealth, advertised social status by signaling freedom from physical labor, exaggerated the fashionable male body and showed that the wearer understood the latest courtly style.
Their impracticality was not a flaw. It was part of the message. Then and now, people are known to go to great lengths for fashion.
Pointed shoes had appeared in Europe before, but the poulaine became a defining fashion of the late 14th and 15th centuries. Its names suggested an association with Poland: poulaine derived from a French expression for footwear “in the Polish fashion,” while crakow evoked Kraków. The precise route by which the style spread remains less certain than the names imply, but it moved through European courts and cities before becoming especially prominent in England.
Many medieval shoes had only modest points. The most dramatic examples belonged largely to wealthy men, who could afford footwear made from costly leather, velvet, silk or embroidered fabric — and who could move through life without needing shoes suited to digging, carrying or running.
“If you were a man of status and you had enough wealth, you wanted to show that off,” footwear historian Rebecca Shawcross told Atlas Obscura.
A long toe declared that its owner did not spend the day behind a plow or inside a muddy workshop. Like an enormous sleeve, a delicate white collar or a train that dragged along the floor, it converted inconvenience into undeniable proof of privilege.
Stay ahead with ZME Science and subscribe.
Please check your inbox and confirm your subscription.
Shoemakers had to be inventive in order to satisfy their high-status customers. They stuffed the points with moss, wool or hair to hold their shape. Some used bone or other stiffeners. The longest shoes required special care. Their wearers sometimes protected them from filthy streets with wooden or leather overshoes called pattens.
Besides advertising wealth, poulaines also changed the appearance of the male body.
During the 14th and 15th centuries, fashionable tunics grew shorter and tighter, exposing more of the legs. Men wore close-fitting hose in vivid colors. A low-cut shoe extended the visual line from the ankle toward a fine point, making the leg appear longer and more dramatic.
At the height of the style, men combined narrow waists, padded shoulders, short garments and elongated shoes to create an exaggerated silhouette, which mainly drew attention toward the lower body. But the more flamboyant the fashion, the less functional it seemed to be to its wearer. Poulaines could make movement very difficult, especially when worn alongside other cumbersome court styles, including large sleeves and long gowns.
But the poulaine’s cumbersomeness was accepted by many, especially after it became deeply associated with masculinity. The longer the poulaine point, the greater the wearer’s masculinity.
The pointy shoes’ phallic shape is what drew the most criticism from medieval observers, particularly members of the church. According to the London Museum’s account of pointy shoes and medieval sexuality, some clerics claimed that the shoes encouraged what they called “sodomy.” Medieval church authorities used that word much more broadly than people generally do today, as it could refer to a range of sexual acts and desires that the church considered improper.
Other complaints from the church were more practical. Extremely pointed shoes could make it difficult to kneel properly during prayer. They also looked extravagant at a time when clergy were expected, at least officially, to dress modestly. The Fourth Lateran Council of 1215 prohibited clerics from wearing embroidered or pointed shoes as part of a broader rule against ostentatious dress. This decree came more than a century before the great poulaine craze, showing that religious authorities had worried about fashionable pointed footwear long before poulaines reached their most extreme form.
The shoes were therefore provocative in several overlapping ways. They displayed legs that older clothing had concealed, exaggerated the male silhouette and allowed wearers to signal confidence, wealth and fashionable masculinity. To church moralists, those same qualities could look like vanity, sexual temptation and an unwillingness to accept the modest appearance expected of a Christian — especially a member of the clergy.
Poulaines were initially popular with royalty. Then courtly styles moved outward through noble households, merchants, craftspeople and urban communities. By the end of the 14th century, pointed forms had become so common that, according to archaeologist Piers Mitchell, “almost every type of shoe was at least slightly pointed.” Archaeologists even found pointed children’s footwear.
The growing popularity of the poulaine in medieval England seems to be connected to the plague. The Black Death killed such a large part of England’s population that surviving workers became harder to replace. Landowners and employers had to compete for labor, giving many workers greater leverage to demand higher wages. For instance, the government’s 1349 Ordinance of Labourers openly complained that workers would no longer serve unless they received what officials called “excessive wages” and attempted to force pay back to pre-plague levels. The government did not succeed.
For many plague survivors, higher wages, inheritances and access to abandoned land meant more money remained after basic needs were met. That did not make ordinary people wealthy by modern standards, and luxury clothing was still extremely expensive. But it allowed a broader section of society to buy more garments, use brighter dyes and replace worn items more frequently.
The 2024 study of European sumptuary laws notes that English peasants increasingly wore blues and greens instead of undyed whites and grays, while ordinary households owned more clothing than they had before the plague. Some, of course, chose to spend their cash on pointy shoes.
This wider adoption created a problem for elites. What was the point of wearing such cumbersome, uncomfortable shoes if the commoners copied them? When prosperous merchants or laborers began copying aristocratic fashions, they blurred those distinctions.
Something had to be done about it. Rather than inventing a new high-status fashion, the high-born simply enacted sumptuary laws to restore the fashion distinction to its proper place. Such laws regulated who could wear particular fabrics, furs, colors and designs. Far from proving that poulaines were universally prohibited, the 1463 English law effectively acknowledged their role in the hierarchy: it reserved greater excess for those at the top while limiting everyone else.
“No Knight under the Estate of a Lord … shall use or wear … Shoes or Boots having Pikes passing the Length of two Inches,” 1463 Apparel Act, 3 Edward IV, chapter 5.
Centuries later, the shoes left researchers another kind of evidence.
In the study published in the International Journal of Paleopathology, archaeologists examined 177 skeletons from four cemeteries in and around Cambridge. They looked for hallux valgus, the displacement of the big toe commonly called a bunion.
Only 6 percent of people buried from the 11th through the 13th centuries showed the deformity. Among those from the 14th and 15th centuries, when pointed shoes had become widespread, the proportion rose to 27 percent.
More revealingly, the condition followed a social gradient. Researchers found it in 3 percent of people at the rural cemetery, 10 percent at a parish burial ground associated largely with working people and 23 percent at a charitable hospital. At an Augustinian friary containing clergy and wealthy benefactors, the figure reached 43 percent. The unnatural distribution of the foot deformity confirms the historical account that urban residents, wealthy people and even supposedly austere clergy embraced pointed shoes most enthusiastically.
By the 1480s, poulaines were disappearing. Fashion swung abruptly toward broad, blunt “duckbill” shoes — another unnatural shape that eventually attracted restrictions of its own.
Medieval Europeans did not need a practical reason to elongate their shoes, any more than later generations needed one to wear towering heels, stiff corsets or painfully narrow winklepickers. The pointed toe succeeded because other people recognized it, and when something truly novel came along that drew more attention, the poulaine was swiftly discarded.

Tibi is a science journalist and co-founder of ZME Science. He writes mainly about emerging tech, physics, climate, and space. In his spare time, Tibi likes to make weird music on his computer and groom felines. He has a B.Sc in mechanical engineering and an M.Sc in renewable energy systems.
© 2007-2025 ZME Science – Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.
© 2007-2025 ZME Science – Not exactly rocket science. All Rights Reserved.